The story introducing the chapter about fraternal twins suggests that race is a social interpretation rather than strictly genetic.

The story introducing the chapter about fraternal twins suggests that race is a social interpretation rather than strictly genetic.

• A. True
• B. False
• C. Not mentioned
• D. Both A and B

Answer: (A)

Race is presented as a social interpretation rather than a fixed genetic fact. In the opening story about fraternal twins, the emphasis is on how society assigns meaning to physical differences and organizes people into racial categories through culture, history, and power, not through biology alone. Even though fraternal twins share about half their genes, the way they are raced or treated can reflect social classifications rather than deterministic genetics. This aligns with the broader sociological view that human diversity cannot be cleanly separated into biologically discrete races, since genetic variation within any so-called race is greater than variation between races. So the statement is true: race is a social interpretation, not a strict genetic categorization.

Race is presented as a social interpretation rather than a fixed genetic fact. In the opening story about fraternal twins, the emphasis is on how society assigns meaning to physical differences and organizes people into racial categories through culture, history, and power, not through biology alone. Even though fraternal twins share about half their genes, the way they are raced or treated can reflect social classifications rather than deterministic genetics. This aligns with the broader sociological view that human diversity cannot be cleanly separated into biologically discrete races, since genetic variation within any so-called race is greater than variation between races. So the statement is true: race is a social interpretation, not a strict genetic categorization.